Sunday, March 11, 2007
the legacy of "the medium is the message" website
http://www.collectionscanada.ca/innis-mcluhan/
I fowarded this link through email yesterday. I browsed the site today and I found that it is a very helpful site to us. Though I haven't read much works by Innis, his ideas are not too new to us.
Those essays (all by Canadian scholars) on archive as a medium are of particular interest to me. One essay sort of answered one of my questions about the difference between a library and an archive. Some writings give me inspiration about how to approach my seminar paper for the class.
I fowarded this link through email yesterday. I browsed the site today and I found that it is a very helpful site to us. Though I haven't read much works by Innis, his ideas are not too new to us.
Those essays (all by Canadian scholars) on archive as a medium are of particular interest to me. One essay sort of answered one of my questions about the difference between a library and an archive. Some writings give me inspiration about how to approach my seminar paper for the class.
Friday, March 9, 2007
Remnants.
From the NYT:
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) -- Moving more quickly than expected, the 11-nation body overseeing a long-secret archive of Nazi war records set procedures inHere is a little something about the archives and their contents:
motion Thursday to open millions of files on concentration camps and their victims before the end of the year.
The article also begins to explore some of the implications of this wider access:
Thursday, March 8, 2007
The and and the in of Squirl.
Have you encountered Squirl? It is described here. I am wondering if it might provide a non-linguistic place where animals "(i) frenzied, (j) innumerable, (k) drawn with a very fine camelhair brush" might meet? Or is it a linguistic space? And could we say, "Squirl rebuilds the and of the enumeration by making impossible the in where the things enumerated would be divided up"?
Wednesday, March 7, 2007
Greetings.
There is no exercise of the intellect which is not, in the final analysis, useless. A philosophical doctrine begins as a plausible description of the universe; with the passage of years it becomes a mere chapter—if not a paragraph or a name—in the history of philosophy. In literature, this eventual caducity is even more notorious. The Quixote—Menard told me—was, above all, an entertaining book; now it is the occasion for patriotic toasts, grammatical insolence and obscene de luxe editions. Fame is a form of incomprehension, perhaps the worst.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)